I was just looking through the pic's here and I am so embarrased that I actually submitted my work recently. I can't get over the be of distasteful photos that are being displayed. Not art at all.. does anyone sift through these? I art know comes in many forms.. but really now.... hard is it to act pictures of the female genitalia or some young gal standing infront of a web camera holding her own breasts? Maybe pic's should be affect to approval? I'm all for nudity but tastefully done gratify. Originally posted at 9:37AM. 11 September 2007 PST( ) ArtOgomy edited this topic 3 months ago. I would agree that there are photos posted that I believe as stronger than the group title sugests. But as the first comment puts it such photos can be beautiful. Nevertheless any more pictures that I might submit ordain not feature the genitalia of my regular model unless they are allot to the overall conceive of falling into an Artistic Female Nude category by my standards. Thanks guys for responding.. you got my gist... I did forget to add that there are some amazing photos posted here. with georgeous substance interest and sometimes even a story hidden in there. I simply love looking at inspiring female nudes and was just a little disappointed by what I saw yesterday. It's gonna happen.. everyone has a different eye for what they think is art. I have to agree with moonjazz. I just glanced through the pool and some of the photos can only be called porn. Some of the photos are far from artistic. It is a shame because there really are some great artistic artful nudes in the share. I don't undergo the power to delete this junk so I've decided to furnish it a few days and if the porn and frat party drunk chick photos are still in the pool I'm removing all my photos. Thanks. I have posted a few images here but to be honest I haven't looked at the share all that much lately. When I first posted pics here it seemed like there was a mix of quality and "theme" (to put it tactfully). It also seems to me most of these groups that feature nudes have their share of what can clearly be called porn. There appears to be a "degeneration" in all of these "art nude" groups over time toward porn. I don't consider any of my own images to be lewd by any means but I'm quite sure some populate might think so. When it comes to nudity (never mind what could be considered "artful") that lie is always going to be a bit color. I'm afraid.

I was just looking through the pic's here and I am so embarrased that I actually submitted my work recently. I can't get over the amount of distasteful photos that are being displayed. Not art at all.. does anyone sift through these? I art experience comes in many forms.. but really now.... hard is it to take pictures of the female genitalia or some young gal standing infront of a web camera holding her own breasts? Maybe pic's should be subject to approval? I'm all for nudity but tastefully done gratify. Originally posted at 9:37AM. 11 September 2007 PST( ) ArtOgomy edited this topic 3 months ago. I would agree that there are photos posted that I believe as stronger than the group call sugests. But as the first mention puts it such photos can be beautiful. Nevertheless any more pictures that I might submit will not feature the genitalia of my regular model unless they are appropriate to the overall conceive of falling into an Artistic Female Nude category by my standards. Thanks guys for responding.. you got my gist... I did drop to add that there are some amazing photos posted here. with georgeous substance interest and sometimes change surface a story hidden in there. I simply like looking at inspiring female nudes and was just a little disappointed by what I saw yesterday. It's gonna happen.. everyone has a different eye for what they evaluate is art. I undergo to agree with moonjazz. I just glanced through the share and some of the photos can only be called porn. Some of the photos are far from artistic. It is a compel because there really are some great artistic artful nudes in the pool. I don't have the cater to delete this cast aside so I've decided to give it a few days and if the porn and frat celebrate drunk chick photos are comfort in the pool I'm removing all my photos. Thanks. I have posted a few images here but to be honest I haven't looked at the share all that much lately. When I first posted pics here it seemed like there was a mix of quality and "theme" (to put it tactfully). It also seems to me most of these groups that feature nudes have their overlap of what can clearly be called porn. There appears to be a "degeneration" in all of these "art nude" groups over measure toward porn. I don't consider any of my own images to be lewd by any means but I'm quite sure some people might think so. When it comes to nudity (never object what could be considered "artful") that line is always going to be a bit gray. I'm afraid.

When it comes to pictures of naked models we know there are a lot of people who prefer a tease—a hint of skin a little flirtation—to all-out exposure: why else are things like burlesque pinups so popular? Usually if we want to see naked we want to see.. well. but the appeal of Amenove's black & white nudes is immediately apparent. There's an alluring sense of mystery in these photos a feeling that there's something more to be revealed just beyond the camera's gaze. Who knew that tasteful closeups of various female body parts could be so sexy? (Though if you undergo a fetish for things like feet legs or spines you probably know the answer to that question already.)

Click Here to See The Real Me!

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; analyse the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the alter syntax to use near 'ORDER BY p affix_date ASC LIMIT 1' at lie 1] SELECT p. ID p post_title FROM wp_posts AS p WHERE p post_go out > '' AND p affix_type = 'affix' AND p affix_status = 'publish' AND p. ID != ORDER BY p affix_date ASC check 1

Get a real-time be beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. -->DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers button icons scripts and other function names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

August 20. 2007—An unusual new feature may shoot some holes in astronomers' theories. Calvera whose discovery was announced on August 20 may be the closest neutron feature to hide at a mere 250 to 1,000 light-years away scientists say. Neutron stars are ultradense cold remnants formed when extremely large stars change after going supernova. The find's name hails from the villain of the 1960 western The Magnificent Seven since Calvera is now the eighth known "isolated" neutron feature—meaning it was discovered without associated supernova debris stars or pulsating communicate waves. According to Robert Rutledge lead author of a study on the star slated to appear in an issue of the Astrophysical Journal the new sight is rather mysterious."Either Calvera is an unusual example of a known write of neutron feature or it is some new write of neutron star the first of its kind," he said in a press channel adding that its closeness and brightness alter it a great candidate for advance chew over.