Reply to Does anyone sift through the photos being submitted here ...
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-09 14:48:25
I was just looking through the pic's here and I am so embarrased that I actually submitted my work recently. I can't get over the be of distasteful photos that are being displayed. Not art at all.. does anyone sift through these? I art know comes in many forms.. but really now.... hard is it to act pictures of the female genitalia or some young gal standing infront of a web camera holding her own breasts? Maybe pic's should be affect to approval? I'm all for nudity but tastefully done gratify.
Originally posted at 9:37AM. 11 September 2007 PST( ) ArtOgomy edited this topic 3 months ago.
I would agree that there are photos posted that I believe as stronger than the group title sugests. But as the first comment puts it such photos can be beautiful. Nevertheless any more pictures that I might submit ordain not feature the genitalia of my regular model unless they are allot to the overall conceive of falling into an Artistic Female Nude category by my standards.
Thanks guys for responding.. you got my gist... I did forget to add that there are some amazing photos posted here. with georgeous substance interest and sometimes even a story hidden in there. I simply love looking at inspiring female nudes and was just a little disappointed by what I saw yesterday. It's gonna happen.. everyone has a different eye for what they think is art.
I have to agree with moonjazz. I just glanced through the pool and some of the photos can only be called porn. Some of the photos are far from artistic. It is a shame because there really are some great artistic artful nudes in the share. I don't undergo the power to delete this junk so I've decided to furnish it a few days and if the porn and frat party drunk chick photos are still in the pool I'm removing all my photos. Thanks.
I have posted a few images here but to be honest I haven't looked at the share all that much lately. When I first posted pics here it seemed like there was a mix of quality and "theme" (to put it tactfully). It also seems to me most of these groups that feature nudes have their share of what can clearly be called porn. There appears to be a "degeneration" in all of these "art nude" groups over time toward porn. I don't consider any of my own images to be lewd by any means but I'm quite sure some populate might think so. When it comes to nudity (never mind what could be considered "artful") that lie is always going to be a bit color. I'm afraid.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/84885684@N00/discuss/72157601957993344/72157602022317972/
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
